Essay Zone.com - Free essays!
REGISTER NOW!
Login to an existing account
     
GCSE essays
A Level essays
University essays
Forum
Why join?
Essay quality
FAQ

Search forums
About us
Contact us

 

 
Why is Act One of ‘The Crucible’ a dramatically effective opening to the play? Free essay! Download now

Home > A Level > English > Why is Act One of ‘The Crucible’ a dramatically effective opening to the play?

Why is Act One of ‘The Crucible’ a dramatically effective opening to the play?

You can download this essay for free. All you need to do is register and submit at least one of your essays to us.

Or you can purchase this essay for just $2 instantly without registering

Downloads to date: N/A | Words: 3232 | Submitted: 28-Mar-2011
Spelling accuracy: 98.3% | Number of pages: 4 | Filetype: Word .doc


This is what the first 3 pages of the essay look like

Why is Act One of ‘The Crucible’ a dramatically effective opening to the play? essay previewWhy is Act One of ‘The Crucible’ a dramatically effective opening to the play? essay previewWhy is Act One of ‘The Crucible’ a dramatically effective opening to the play? essay preview

Description

Why is Act One of Arthur Miller's ‘The Crucible’ a dramatically effective opening to the play?

Preview

Why is Act One of ‘The Crucible’ a dramatically effective opening to the play?

Arthur Miller’s ‘The Crucible’ is a very powerful, intense and very dramatic play. The play, The Crucible, illustrates how people react to mass hysteria created by a person or group of people, being a reflection of Miller’s own experience of irrational and unethical judgements except, during another period of history. In the late 1940’s to the early 1960’s, many people had to testify to judgements made by the House Of Un-American Activities Committee, who’s main aim was to find communism activities throughout America and put a stop to it, however, their judgements and accusations were a little too suspicious as Miller had to testify 1956. He had earlier gone to Salem, Massachusetts to research for his book, The Crucible, based on the witch crafts of 1692. The HUAC became suspicious of this and when he went to apply for a passport he was denied of one and they used this as an opportunity to call him to appear before the committee and either defend or deny the accusations. What was different about this trial than any others was that Miller refused to give names of other people who were involved in communism like the other people trialled had given. This displays the behaviour of John Proctor in the Crucible as it says in Act 4 as one of the last things he speaks ‘Because I lie and sign myself to lies! Because I am not worth the dust on the feet of them that hang!’ This shows exactly how Miller felt, they both feel that this is morally wrong and damaging to anyone’s reputation including them and they refuse to give names of others to get them in trouble as they don’t believe in the accusations asked upon them in the first place. The Crucible is based on a group of Christians called the Puritans. The Puritans were a group of settlers that landed in Salem, Massachusetts in the 17th Century. They were a small group of highly religious fanatics that had moved to the New World to escape the decadent and corrupted society of Europe. Puritanism was one of the strict religions ever formed, and in their colonies no sin was allowed. The Church was at the centre of the Puritans life and it was against the law not to attend. Men and women sat ...

Download this essay in full now!

Just upload at one of your essays to our database and instantly download your selection! Registration takes seconds

Or you can download this essay for $2 immediately without registering


Comments and reviews

Reviews are written by members who have downloaded the essay

No comments yet. If you download the essay you can review it afterwards.